ѻý

Skip to content

Sexism in politics is nauseating

Sexism in politics is nauseating
web1_kathy-michaels-2017

At eight weeks pregnant, most of my workday was spent suppressing the urge to vomit on whomever I was interviewing.

That memory was why I was momentarily floored by the recent revelation that Serena Williams won the Australian Open final while at the same stage in her pregnancy, triumphing 6-4, 6-4 in the final.

My amazement abated when I also remembered sheѻýs a supreme athlete and sports role model for the agesѻýan absolute pro.

Why shouldnѻýt she prevail in her area of expertise while her uterus was occupied? I certainly wasnѻýt less able to quote ѻý90s TV like a proѻýmy area of expertiseѻý when I had a tummy-expanding tenant.

Thing is, being a woman isnѻýt an impediment. Sure, we have socially constructed road-blocks, but we, in our respective areas of expertise, are good enough, smart enough and it really doesnѻýt matter at all whether you like us as we succeed. (Ten points if you can identify that bungled ѻý90s-ism.)

Thatѻýs what I like about our premier, actually.

She is an ace politician. She can deliver and take sharp political blows in equal measure and still come out unruffled, mastering the balance between light and serious better than the majority of her contemporaries.

Sheѻýs confident, knows her material and doesnѻýt back down. Like Williams with tennis. Like me, with ѻý90s TV quotes.

BC Liberals know this, Iѻýd assume. Thatѻýs why sheѻýs their party leader.

Yet lately they seem to want to make her sound like sheѻýs a victim and I canѻýt help but think that itѻýs a terrible bit of strategy that not only undermines the premier but women in general.

This all came up in a debate a week ago when BC NDP leader John Horgan repeatedly interrupted Clark. He was snarkyѻýlike everyone elseѻýand at one point he said she should ѻýtake a few minutes and read something.ѻý

Clark handled it well, but party supporters were ridiculously excited about it.

Mike McDonald, who was previously Clarkѻýs chief of staff got onto the Twitter and wrote ѻýѻýBut todayѻýs radio debate takes the cake. (Horgan) is clearly threatened by a strong female leader.ѻý

Pamela Martin, another party insider, took to Huffington Post to talk about Horganѻýs comments and equated them to casual sexism, noting it has no place in our political system.

Then all these women on the a political gossip page I follow took her words to heart and started posting about how they couldnѻýt vote for the NDP, now that they know Horgan is a sexist.

This threw me for a loop and made me actually wonder: Is John Horgan really a universal-daycare shilling sexist or was he simply utilizing the rules of engagement?

Itѻýs the latter, in case you donѻýt know where Iѻým going with this.

Politicians are unpleasant during debates. Theyѻýre not making a case to be invited for dinner.

Thatѻýs where theyѻýre supposed to be elbowing their way in and making a point, and we as observers take the theatrical with a grain of salt while we listen to where they stand on issues that affect our lives. As for how they conducted themselves, Horgan doesnѻýt have to like Clark. Clark doesnѻýt have to like Horgan. Theyѻýre opponents of equal skill fighting for different things.

Calling what happened during the debate sexism doesnѻýt forward the case for womenѻýs equality. What it did was capitalize on these unfortunate themes for the sake of political gain and that makes me a little nauseated.





(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }